Community-based research into the feasibility, advantages, and challenges of onboarding USDT and USDC natively onto the Cardano blockchain.

15 January 2025

Introduction

On behalf of Intersect, Appold, an independent blockchain technology and advisory company, has undertaken preliminary stakeholder research into the feasibility, advantages, and challenges of onboarding stablecoins USDT (Tether) and USDC (USD Coin) natively onto the Cardano blockchain. This research, conducted in conjunction with the Cardano DApp community, explores potential benefits, risks and technical considerations associated with integrating these stablecoins into the Cardano ecosystem.

Through engagement with the Cardano community, this research aims to provide an understanding of perceptions towards the impact of USDT and USDC integration on Cardano in the four following areas:

  1. Feasibility Assessment: Evaluate the technical compatibility and feasibility of integrating USDT and USDC onto Cardano, considering blockchain interoperability and innovative contract capabilities.

  2. Advantages and Use Cases: Identify the potential benefits of USDT and USDC on Cardano and explore use cases that could enhance the blockchain's utility.

  3. Risk Analysis: Conduct a comprehensive risk assessment, examining potential challenges, regulatory considerations, and impact on the Cardano network's stability and security.

  4. Community Impact: Assess the potential impact on the Cardano community, considering user adoption, engagement, and overall ecosystem growth.

Methodology

To undertake this research, Appold was invited to join a community-run Stablecoins Working Group, comprised of several significant application builders in the Cardano ecosystem, including IOG, Cardano Foundation, EMURGO, Atrium Labs, FluidToken, Waffle Capital, Minswap and Liqwid. We are very grateful to them for supporting the research and production of this report.

Initially, the Working Group met regularly to identify further Cardano companies prominent within the Cardano blockchain ecosystem who would be able to offer insights into the four research areas. A list of the most relevant and influential Cardano-based companies was drawn up, and feedback was then sought from the Working Group on the selected companies, who also assisted with specific introductions to companies not known to Appold. Engagements were had with 38 companies, and their insights form the basis of this research. We are grateful to all the developers and companies that contributed.

To standardise information gathering from the selected companies across the four research areas, Appold devised a research questionnaire, which was then amended and reviewed by the Working Group for reasonableness and relevance. 

Appold determined that the most effective way to procure the research would be to conduct interviews with the target companies, which would help maintain consistency and relevance across the questions. Once completed, the interviews were recorded and transcribed into the survey, and the findings were aggregated in this report.

The Interviewees

Atrium lab

-

Axo

-

Mercury

-

Cardanoscan

-

Cornucopias

-

Coti

-

Danogo

-

dcSpark

-

DexHunter

-

Empowa

-

EMURGO

-

Flint Wallet

-

Fluidtokens

-

Genlambda

-

Iagon

-

Indigo Protocol

-

IOG

-

JamOnBread

-

JPG Store

-

Liqwid

-

Moneta (USDM)

-

Moneta

-

Midnight

-

Minswap

-

Mynth

-

NEWM

-

NMKR

-

Rare Network

-

Revuto

-

Strica

-

Sundaeswap

-

Teko.vn

-

Typhoon Wallet

-

VyFinance

-

Waffle Capital

-

WingRiders

-

Yoroi Wallet

-

World Mobile

-

Atrium lab - Axo - Mercury - Cardanoscan - Cornucopias - Coti - Danogo - dcSpark - DexHunter - Empowa - EMURGO - Flint Wallet - Fluidtokens - Genlambda - Iagon - Indigo Protocol - IOG - JamOnBread - JPG Store - Liqwid - Moneta (USDM) - Moneta - Midnight - Minswap - Mynth - NEWM - NMKR - Rare Network - Revuto - Strica - Sundaeswap - Teko.vn - Typhoon Wallet - VyFinance - Waffle Capital - WingRiders - Yoroi Wallet - World Mobile -

Interviewee background information

Company age

Interviewees were asked how long their company has been operational within the Cardano ecosystem. The answers ranged from less than one year to being a founding member of the Cardano blockchain network.

Years operatng on Cardano

Years operating

Here is a general breakdown of the length of time that the interviewees have been operating within the Cardano ecosystem.

One events organiser company has operated within the broader tech sector for 5 years and has produced live events for almost 20 years. This was counted as not applicable in this graph.

Company categorisation

The interviewees fell roughly into the following categories.

Interviewees were also given the opportunity to self-describe as non-listed categories. Other categories given included; Consulting, Insurance, AI, DEX, Infrastructure Development, Token Launching, Protocol Governance, NFT Ticketing, Events Organisation, Distributed Storage, Stablecoin Issuer, Research and Development, Decentralised Physical Infrastructure, Wallets, Chain Explorer and Software Development.

Current stablecoin usage

Stablecoins in Use

Of the 38 companies interviewed, 35 currently use or have previously used stablecoins on other blockchains. The primary coins used by these companies, on Cardano or on other blockchains, were USDC, USDT, DJED, USDM, and iUSD. A full breakdown can be seen in this chart.

Non-Cardano chain usage

When asked if they operate on chains other than Cardano, exactly half of the companies said they do.

Of these other chains, the most used were Arbitrum, Ethereum, BASE, Polygon and TRON, with some usage on Polkadot, Algorand, Avalanche, TON, Optimism, Hedera, Bitcoin, Xai and Solana.

When prompted to explain why these chains were used, respondents typically cited cheaper fees, easier on-off-ramping, the need to hold widely used stablecoins for treasury and payment purposes, and trust.

The impact of introducing stablecoins to other blockchains

When stablecoins have been introduced to other blockchains, respondents almost unanimously answered that this tends to have a positive or neutral impact in the long term. Beyond short-term trust or userbase ideology issues, which are generally resolved over time, or specific examples such as problems faced by USDC users on TRON, respondents tended to claim that stablecoins had positive impacts.

Potential advantages to the use of native large stablecoins on company operations

During the interview, respondents were asked if introducing leading stablecoins onto Cardano would positively impact their company.

  • Increased liquidity - 91% agree

  • Transaction volatility – 88% agree

  • Enhanced user experience – 84 % agree

  • Easier integration with financial systems – 84% agree

  • Attraction of new users – 81% agree

  • Increased trust and stability – 65% agree

Some interviewees clearly felt that USDC would be more effective than USDT in increasing trust and stability. This is because some respondents identified USDC as more ‘corporate’ and trusted by those already established within the sector.

One interviewee noted that introducing established large stablecoins such as USDC and USDT could negatively impact the community by creating a perceived bias in favour of the big players over community-backed native stablecoin projects.

The most significant advantage

This graph shows the answers that were provided when asked to give the most significant advantage.

How would introducing established Stablecoins impact various services operating in the Cardano ecosystem?

Payments and remittances

There is a general agreement between interviewees that payments and remittance services currently operating on Cardano would benefit from the introduction of established stablecoins. This is because users of these services would like to be paid in stablecoins, and the only way to do this on Cardano currently is to use a lower-volume native stablecoin, a wrapped/bridged stablecoin, or transfer stablecoins on a separate chain; all of these options are not ideal and may put users off from engaging with these services.

Several interviewees noted that while introducing established stablecoins to Cardano would remove one barrier to entry for potential users, there are obvious downsides to using Cardano compared to other chains, which may limit any pull factors generated by this decision. For example, Cardano has higher fees and slower transaction speeds than TRON or Polygon. For those not already heavily interacting with the Cardano ecosystem, simply having the option to interact with payments and remittance services on Cardano is unlikely to bring new customers, while alternatives remain an option.

In order to agree a payment value, you must tie it to a dollar amount that, for example, the invoice is for. If they forget or they’re late three days of an invoice, all of a sudden the price may change 5% and they would have to pay 5% in ADA value more than three days ago. So I think it’s very annoying for everyone.
— Melon, DexHunter

For those who are serious about interacting with Web3 but have limited experience, Cardano, once established stablecoins have been introduced, could be seen as the best option due to other Cardano features, such as its transaction security and trust. For these users, as well as institutions, speed and transaction fees may not be the most important factor, making Cardano a good option.

Lending and borrowing

There was almost unanimous agreement that the introduction of large, established stablecoins would help lending and borrowing apps on Cardano. The main reason outlined for this is trust; this includes trust in the price stability of stablecoins over ADA, which is more volatile, trust in the available liquidity, and trust in the lending and borrowing protocols that use stablecoins as a preferred asset.

One respondent also claimed that the introduction of stablecoins would benefit those who hold large amounts of ADA but would prefer to receive payouts in stablecoins.

Decentralised Exchanges

There was broad consensus that the liquidity and greater interoperability that would occur with the introduction of USDC or USDT would benefit DEXs. This would allow for more trading pairs, reduce slippage, and bring more potential users to Cardano DEXs.

Tokenised assets

There was broad agreement that platforms facilitating tokenisation assets would benefit from the introduction of large stablecoins, primarily from a user perspective. As real-world assets are priced in fiat, being able to price these assets in fiat on platforms would make it easier to attract new users. Using a stablecoin would also remove the need for regular price changes reflective of ADA volatility.

Current tokenisation asset platforms do not use Cardano-native stablecoins as the liquidity is too low. One respondent made clear his vision that from a user perspective, tokenisation asset platforms should be able to operate on any chain without impacting the ability to do business. The respondent stated:

We need to get to a world where users of platforms don’t even know what blockchain they’re interacting with. And when it comes to tokenising assets, a regular user is just going to want to pay in cash - maybe there’s a front end that immediately converts this to cash or the cash to a stablecoin. And then that stablecoin is what’s used on the Cardano blockchain.
—  Peyton Winget, Atrium Labs

Cross-border transactions

Respondents were split on whether they believed the introduction of large stablecoins would have a positive or neutral impact on apps facilitating cross-border transactions. This is primarily due to the fact that Cardano-native stablecoins lack liquidity and trust and the fees saved from sending assets across chains.

Risk analysis

Regulatory concerns

Respondents had a range of views as to whether there would be regulatory concerns with implementing USDC or USDT. This was partly due to the interpretative nature of this risk.

From a governance and regulation perspective, respondents tended to agree that Cardano has minimal risk as these regulations apply to the coin issuers (Circle, Tether, etc) rather than Cardano.

From a Cardano framework perspective, some interviewees highlighted Circle’s requirements for clawback and wallet-freezing capabilities. This is not currently possible using Cardano’s infrastructure, and adding this capability would require significant changes to Cardano’s infrastructure. Some saw this as a regulatory concern and others as a technical concern. Several interviewees also highlighted that the decision to grant these capabilities would likely see a severe backlash from some community members.

One interviewee highlighted how introducing large stablecoins such as USDC and USDT adds a risk that if large asset holders move onto the chain quickly, this is an inherent risk to Proof of Stake blockchains. In the event of a fork in the chain, large holders of these assets could have vast power to dictate which fork is validated.

Some interviewees also highlighted that Circle and Tether are centralised organisations, which, to some members of the Cardano community, is at odds with the community's foundations.

One interviewee highlighted that end-user jurisdictional regulations must be considered, but this is unlikely to be a major concern. Another noted that regional laws could limit the ability to onboard some users, which could, in turn, limit the impact this would have.

There are certainly ideological concerns about these stablecoins coming in and gobbling up quite a bit of liquidity/equity… so much so that they could potentially swing the culture and direction of a chain at some point in the future. Perhaps through governance actions, hard forks, or the like.
— Sheldon Hunt, EMURGO

Technical concerns

In general, respondents agreed that there were either no technical concerns or that some limited concerns exist, but they are no greater than when any other asset is added to Cardano and that Cardano has more than enough expertise to mitigate and combat these technical concerns.

One respondent raised concerns that if USDC or USDT are brought onto Cardano, there will be a rush to convert large holdings from ADA to one of these stablecoins. This could impact the price of ADA, impacting all aspects of the chain and the wider ecosystem.

Impact on network stability

Respondents were split on whether Cardano would naturally scale to the required demand should there be an increase in traffic following the introduction of USDC or if this could have a material impact on network stability. In all cases, respondents made clear that Cardano should embrace new users and increased transaction flow. If this does end up causing network instability, this is a poor reflection on the chain, and users would rightly criticise the chain for not having the capability to handle increased traffic.

Several respondents made clear that this is not necessarily a concern and should instead be viewed as a challenge that the chain must overcome to prove that it is a serious competitor to other blockchains.

I don’t think the network stability would be impacted because Cardano was built in a way so you can have that kind of activity. The only thing is, okay, everything will be super slow and then we will have to react and essentially do upgrades to the network. But that’s bound to happen anyways. It’s a requirement for that to happen at some point. So that’s what we want…
— Patrick Tobler, NMKR
It’s a good problem to have, but it is still a problem. I think we will get to a place perhaps a year from now, if not sooner, where we have layer twos that are going to be solving significant issues here. But in the interim, yes, there is a possibility that, say, for. Excuse me, for an example, there is a killer app that is providing high frequency remittance around the world for migrant workers. There’s probably a good chance if it’s used by tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands in a single day, that it could slow down the chain. And that is a problem.
— anonymous

User adoption challenges

While a handful of respondents stated concerns that introducing USDC or USDT could make user adoption more difficult, the vast majority of respondents either claimed it would have no impact or would ease user adoption challenges.

While respondents claimed it would have no impact, many quickly stated that this was a market issue. While there are currently some established players, the stablecoin market is still in the early stages, and the market will decide which stablecoin comes out on top; there is no guarantee that USDC or USDT, as the two current largest players, will be the overall winner once there are more alternatives and full market forces at play. Currently, USDT and USDC are well-established and recognisable assets likely to add clarity when several options already exist.

Where respondents claimed this would have no impact, responses generally referred to the fact that there are already so many assets available that adding a couple more simply cannot have a significant effect.

It’s always the market that decides, you know, which one is the safest, which one is the easiest to use, etc.
— Florian Volery, Liqwid Finance

Competition with other blockchains

Responses to this question generally followed one of three lines of reasoning and were split between them:

  1. Following the introduction of USDC or USDT, Cardano will become a competitor to other chains, and this is a challenge that must, and can, be met.

  2. Cardano is already a challenger to other chains, and adding USDC or USDT will strengthen Cardano’s position.

  3. Cardano is not a competitor to other chains because it has unique features. Even following the introduction of USDC or USDT, this will not make Cardano a direct competitor.

The most significant concerns identified

The Significant concerns

Of the potential problems identified, respondents claimed that the following were the most important.

To combat these concerns, interviewees made clear that thorough research should be completed, and if necessary, multiple stablecoins should be implemented.

Community Impact

General community sentiment

Interviewees were asked if they believed the introduction of large stablecoins would positively or negatively impact the Cardano community. While many interviewees recognised that the community is not 100% supportive of the introduction of large stablecoins, there was almost sentiment that the move would have a more positive than negative impact if done properly and liquidity comes to the chain. Many of the interviewees refer to a vocal minority who will try to stop this move, even if the vast majority are in favour.

Of the three interviewees who were unclear if this would have a positive or negative impact, two claimed that it is simply too hard to determine the current levels of users and developers who want to see this happen. One claimed that USDC would be positive while USDT would be negative.

So yes, you’re going to have a small but very vocal crew of Maxis. That will say you’ve degraded everything that we believe in to be able to accomplish this. But outside of that, if we can get that spiral effect going, they’re going to be drowned out very quickly by the new users we bring on.
— Steven Ward, VyFinance
I don’t believe it’s essential for people to know whether USDC or USDT are issued on chains like Ethereum or Cardano. All they need to know is that it’s secure and it does the job. However, I do think these stablecoins should be issued on Cardano to enhance its relevance.
— Michal Urbanek, JamOnBread

Impact on user engagement and adoption

Interviewees were generally in agreement that the introduction of USDC or USDT would increase user engagement and adoption. Some of the reasons cited for this include increased liquidity on-chain, the psychological victory of onboarding large liquidity assets, the ability to build better applications, and better interoperability with other chains.

Impact on the overall growth of the Cardano ecosystem

Interviewees were unanimous in believing that introducing large stablecoins would positively impact the overall growth of the Cardano ecosystem. However, they were split on whether the impact would be significant or limited. Several interviewees made clear they do not see this as a silver bullet and that it will only be effective if other measures are also taken.

I think the reason Cardano has fallen from its position is because we don’t have this implementation. We don’t have the stablecoins to be able to maintain our ecosystem like the other blockchains do… some people start looking, then they get more volume, then more people start looking, then they get more, and then liquidity, and then more people start looking. And then before you know it, you’ve got large institutional players that are willing to engage.
— Steven Ward, VyFinance

Impact on business operations

Impact of large stablecoins on business financial operations

84% of interviewees believe introducing large stablecoins would improve their business financial operations.

Five businesses interviewed stated this would have no impact. This is because either all payments are made in fiat or non-USDC/USDT, or stablecoins are not accepted at enough traditional institutions for this to have a major impact.

Impact on Treasury Management

The vast majority of interviewees agreed that the fundamental structures of treasuries would likely be unaffected, as the vast majority already convert treasury funds to stablecoins, but this tends to occur off-Cardano. However, if treasury management efficiency is improved via lower fees, as there is no need to interact with a centralised exchange and move funds off-chain, then treasury funds will be more likely to be kept on-chain.

This would also allow some companies to diversify their treasury funds further.

So much easier and you don’t have to risk transferring the assets to Kraken or whatever exchange you’re using, convert it… So much easier just having it in treasury in one place and without having to send and receive and convert
— Navjit Dhaliwal, Iagon

Transaction efficiency

Businesses that pay bills, including salaries, in stablecoins tended to agree that introducing large stablecoins onto Cardano would improve transaction efficiency, reducing the need for expensive transactions via centralised exchanges.

Several interviewees cited the speed of sending transactions as a significant positive factor in sending stablecoins for payments on Cardano.

Pilot program

Interviewees were asked if they would be willing to participate in a pilot program to trail the introduction of large stablecoins on Cardano. Of the companies interviewed, 27 agreed to participate in a pilot program. Of those that did not want to take part, this was generally because they were ‘users’ of the platform rather than developers and so would not bring a benefit to taking part in the pilot.

Additional Comments

One interviewee highlighted the opportunity for better staking services if USDC or USDT were introduced to Cardano. This is because Cardano staking yields are comparatively high, but ADA is too volatile.

Another interviewee stated that while large fiat-backed stablecoins are necessary, some focus must be given to open-source algorithmic stablecoins, which serve a distinctly different purpose within the ecosystem. 

Several interviewees highlighted that one of the biggest challenges to this problem is the culture of the Cardano community, including perceived politics at the Cardano Foundation. For this to succeed, there must be a change of messaging to bring about more community cohesion.

Conclusion of research

Amongst the companies interviewed, there is strong support for introducing large stablecoins onto Cardano.

There was no unanimous agreement on all the points raised, including risks and advantages, and companies offered a wide range of thoughts on why this project should go ahead. However, the sentiment was clearly in favour of introducing these assets.

There is general agreement that while USDC is a better candidate for adoption than USDT, introducing both coins would be preferable to just one.

There was also general agreement that while introducing these assets does present challenges, these challenges can and must be overcome. 

Additional research

The research included meetings with Circle and Tether. Circle explained that they are in discussions with the Cardano Foundation and that negotiations are ongoing. Tether explained that they are open to further discussions but have some reservations that will need to be dealt with. The details cannot be made public.

Also, Appold had meetings with other companies that operate on competing chains and had recently implemented USTD and USDC. The general consensus was that this was a positive introduction to their applications, but it took some time to become positive. There were technical challenges to support them, and the project to implement them wasn’t communicated well. Also, there was a lack of liquidity at the start.  These are all lessons to be learned if the Cardano companies decide to go ahead with an implementation.

Potential Next Steps

This research showed some of the positive benefits and challenges that must be carefully mitigated.  Projects can be developed to track these challenges and ensure the benefits are delivered as soon as possible.  The Cardano companies are willing to support this implementation; some will assist with the technical implementation.

At present, the Cardano Foundation is in discussions with Circle.  Another company in the ecosystem could start the conversations with Tether. It is recommended that resources who understand the challenges run these projects.

Also, new stablecoins that are being launched and existing competitors to USDT and USDC could be options to bring to Cardano and attract them with specific use cases.





Appendix A: The stablecoin ecosystem on other blockchain networks

Cardano based game fund raise

Example from one of the projects that raised money for a game.  The chart below shows the distribution of digital assets used to raise the funds.  Ada was the smallest. This was a Cardano-based game, and the result of where the funds came from surprised the founders.

The following section contextualises this paper’s core research by examining the broader adoption of USDT and USDC across blockchain networks and its core use cases and impacts on other chains.

As of 31.12.24, USDT had a market capitalisation of 137bn USD (https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/tether), and USDC had a market capitalisation of 44bn (https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/usdc).

In December 2024, stablecoin transfer volume—the total value of stablecoin transactions processed on a blockchain network and an indicative metric of market demand and liquidity—showed that across 12 chains, stablecoin transfer volume stood at $5.1tn, dominated by Solana ($2.3tn), Base ($895.4bn), Ethereum ($846.9bn), and Tron ($616.7bn).

Stablecoin transfer volumes by blockchain. Source: Artemis

Open-source research indicates that USDT and USDC have found utility across chains in the following use cases. The extent to which these stablecoins are used and the traction they have gained on various chains is predominantly determined by the characteristics of the chains themselves.

  • Payments and Remittances

  • Decentralised Finance (DeFi)

  • Hedging and Trading

  • New user trust-building

  • Gaming and Micropayments

  • Charity and Aid Distribution

  • Cross-border transactions

  • Cross-chain transactions

  • Store of value

Full-Width Table
Blockchain Network Significant supported stablecoins Notable Impacts
Ethereum USDT, USDC, DAI, PYSUD Stablecoins such as USDT and USDC have proven popular on Ethereum for providing a stable and reliable way to store, trade, and transfer value. Indicative of the appeal of stablecoins on Ethereum, in 2023, it was estimated that 60% of participants of Ethereum’s trading market preferred stablecoins to the U.S. dollar. [1]
Solana USDT, USDC, PYUSD, USDS Solana’s low fees have made stablecoin-use particularly popular on the network for cross-border payments and DeFi, which in turn has brought increased liquidity. Support for USDC on Solana has also led to collaboration with global payments giant Visa on several stablecoin-based pilots [2]. A surge in network traffic on Solana driven by memecoin sites such as pump.fun has led to Solana solidifying itself as the most used blockchain for the number of transactions.
Binance Smart Chain USDT, USDC, BUSD, BTCB, DAI BSC’s fast transaction speeds and low fees have made stablecoins popular for payment settlement.
Algorand USDT, USDC, BRZ, USD-MESE, eEUR, eCHF, rUSD Stablecoins haven proven popular for decentralised cross-chain transfers and financial transactions.
Polygon USDT, USDC, MAI, usdSNOW, DAI, AMPL, USDP Stablecoins on Polygon are popular in DeFi, and lending and borrowing activities. A notable surge in stablecoin flow on Polygon in 2023 correlated with a growth in Total Value Locked on the network and increased user activity on dApps such as Planet IX and Quickswap. [3]
Avalanche USDT, USDC, MIM, DAI Stablecoins have led to increased liquidity on Avalanche and are popular on Avalanche for bridging Ethereum-based stablecoins to the Avalanche network.
Celo USDT, USDC Celo’s daily active addresses using stablecoins substantially increased following USDT’s deployment in 2024, and an increase in value of the Celo token. [4]
Tron USDT, TUSD, USDD, USDJ Tron’s low fees and fast transaction speeds provide significant USDT traction to the network in remittances and high-frequency transactions. USDC’s discontinuation of support on Tron in February 2024 on the basis of ‘risk management’ had a significant reputational impact on the Tron blockchain and its perceived stability [5]
Previous
Previous

Appold Market Watch - Week ending 17 January 2025

Next
Next

Appold Market Watch - Week ending 10 January 2025